Big News in Breast Implants, or Is It?

Big News in Breast Implants, or Is It?

In the past, the FDA has cornered the market on raising safety and viability issues with the breast implant industry taking silicone breast implants completely off the market from 1991 – 2006!  Yesterday it’s European equivalent, The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), took center stage in the world of breast implant controversy by suspending the CE mark for Silimed medical devices, including breast implants.

The Plastic Surgery Channel

William P. Adams, Jr. MD of Dallas, Texas, specializes in breast augmentation and is no stranger to breast implants and the controversies that seem to follow them.  He was actually in Europe earlier this week speaking and teaching on the safety and efficacy of breast implants when this announcement was made.  “The Silimed CE mark suspension of all company-wide medical devices made by MHRA, an executive agency of the United Kingdom Department of Health, was big news on Wednesday in Europe.  The exact issue was unclear and length of the suspension unknown,” explains Dr. Adams.TGA

Back across the pond, US based Sientra communicated to its many users as Silimed is one of Sientra’s contract manufacturers.  The communication from CEO Hani Zeini specifically stated:

sientra-letter“Please note that the MHRA announcement has no applicability to Sientra’s products as it is applicable only to the distribution of Silimed’s CE-marked implants in Europe. Our products are FDA-regulated and PMA-approved.  Sientra’s breast implants and our other products continue to be marketed and available in the United States and there has been no change to the regulatory status of Sientra’s FDA-approved breast implants.  We are confident in the safety of our products, and you can reassure your patients as needed by telling them that there has been no indication that these issues would pose a threat to their safety. In light of this news, we will of course conduct our own review to ensure continued compliance with our own high internal standards.”

Although no true clinical issues have materialized to date, investors are certainly taking notice.  Sientra’s stock dropped 50% yesterday.

Patient safety is paramount and given US patient’s past experience with breast implant scares, this announcement might seem a little disturbing however; Dr. Adams says, “I have used  Sientra’s products since their release and am fully confident in their quality, and  will continue to use for patients we feel they are ideally suited for.”

Click to add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


More in PSC No Spin LIVE

Ransomware and plastic surgery patient privacy.

Ransomware and Plastic Surgery Patient Privacy

Jason Pozner, MDJune 20, 2017

Cosmetic Surgery for Teens and Pre-Teens?

Jason Cooper, MDJune 19, 2017
Understanding the trend of buttock fat grafting deaths.

Understanding the Trend of Buttock Fat Grafting Deaths

Jason Pozner, MDJune 16, 2017

Is Medical Tourism a Good Idea?

Craig ColvilleJune 8, 2017
Social media and plastic surgery.

Social Media and Plastic Surgery Trends

Tracy M. Pfeifer, MDJune 6, 2017
Natalie Morales.

Natalie Morales and Plastic Surgery?

Craig ColvilleJune 2, 2017

“Flesh-Eating Bacteria” and Death Following Liposuction

Patricia McGuire, MDMay 30, 2017
Clinic Changes Branding to Avoid Past of Patient Deaths.

Clinic Changes Branding to Avoid Past of Patient Deaths

Daniel A. Del Vecchio, MDMay 19, 2017
Dermatologist or plastic surgeon for Botox injections?

Who’s the Real Botox Doc, a Dermatologist or a Plastic Surgeon?

Daniel A. Del Vecchio, MDApril 17, 2017